Wednesday, June 19, 2019

From My New Book: 9/11 Was An Act of Faith As Much As It Was An Act of War

“What do you think gave Muslims the idea that flying planes into buildings was a righteous act?”

“Islam. Religious faith. Though, according to some, it’s because they followed a “political” form of Islam, which doesn’t make any sense. In truth, it’s because 9/11 was as much an act of faith as it was an act of war. Nothing could get people to fly planes into buildings except religion, except the irrational belief that they would enter paradise after they crash. The idea that a so-called “political” version of Islam could get Muslims to kill themselves in order to mass-murder others discounts the motivational power of religion. Religion, not politics, leads people to fly planes into buildings.” 

Below is page 109 of my new book, My Mohammad Cartoons Vol. 2, and it's the first page of my six page article that argues against those who routinely deny the religious identity of Islam. Islam IS a religion, and religionists need to make peace with that fact, as well as secular people who strangely pretend that it's a "political" form of Islam which motivates this enemy. Islam is a fusion of religion and politics, and the religious aspect of Islam is the key in getting Muslims to do what secular communists never would have, namely killing themselves in order to kill their enemies, for the ultimate religious goal of entering paradise My book has 100 of my Mohammad cartoons, with 40 of them created exclusively for it. It has two new articles by me, one on Free Speech being in the crosshairs, as well as this one on Islam being a religion, along with an edited, updated and improved version of my 2010 article, Calling Islam Islam, as well as some extras. It's 128 pages, square bound, and you can order it at The Bosch Fawstin Store

So You’re Sick of War?

I’m sick of our government spending the last 18 years not doing what is necessary to end the Islamic enemy’s war on us. I’m sick of our intellectuals selling out the truth by pretending that Islam isn’t the Islamic enemy’s ideology. I’m sick of idiots saying that if we’re to finally respond to Iran’s decades-long war against us- with war -that that would mean that we would be engaging in a “new” war. All of the so-called “wars” that we’ve “fought” since 9/11 are all One war. And that one war, the Islamic enemy’s jihad, goes on because we refuse to end it. So before complaining about how you’re “sick of war”, ask yourself how a very defeatable enemy could remain undefeated if we actually waged war against it for 18 years. You can’t win a war if you refuse to fight it. So if you’re sick of anything, you should be sick of our government prolonging the inevitable, and you should be very sick over how our politicians are able to live with the deaths of American soldiers and civilians, and how they cannot live with criticism of Islam. 

Monday, June 17, 2019

Saturday, June 15, 2019

Trump Goes Full Saudi

Trump just approved of an arms deal, without congressional approval, that will allow U.S. hi-tech bomb parts to be manufactured in the dictatorship of our enemy Saudi Arabia, giving it unprecedented access to a sensitive weapons technology. And just like when Trump sold out Free Speech for Islam after Garland, just like he sword-danced with our enemies, the Saudis, on enemy soil in Saudi Arabia, calling Islam "great", and just like he hosted an Iftar dinner in the white house recently, where he again called Islam "great", this cartoon is the image that comes to my mind. I'm sick and tired of Trump fans excusing everything he does, even if it's things that should be Absolutely unacceptable to All Americans. I will remind Trump fans that he once acknowledged that Saudi Arabia played a role in 9/11, and for him to get in bed with them this deep is as bad as the last two Islam bitches in the white house, Bush and Obama.

Monday, June 10, 2019

Calling Islam Islam

I updated my article, Calling Islam Islam, for my new book, My Mohammad Cartoons Vol. 2. I’m sick and tired of hearing people, and not only lying leftists, refer to the Islamic enemy’s ideology by Endless terms, ALL in the name of Not saying the actual name of the Islamic enemy’s ideology, Islam. We are nearly 18 years removed from the atrocity of 9/11, and we have Yet, outside of a small minority of us, dealt with the fact that “one of the world’s great religions” is motivating a war against civilization. Also, there are far too many religionists who refuse to acknowledge that Islam is a religion, which is another issue I take on in my new book.

This needs to end. If we can’t name the enemy and his ideology, and accept that it is, indeed, a religon, we cannot defeat it. This is about telling the truth, no matter how many sacred cows it kills. This is about defending civilization, not about defending religion’s reputation. This is war. We need to be completely honest, and if we act on the truth, this enemy will be defeated not long after.
We’ve gone from naming enemy ideology -Nazism and Communism- to Renaming it-“Islamic Totalitarianism”, “Radical Islam”, “Islamism”, etc., all to the enemy’s benefit, since these misnomers imply that Islam as such is innocent of jihad. If you’re afraid to name the problem -Islam- then you can’t fight it effectively, and the enemy wants this to continue forever. The only difference between “Islamism” and Islam is three letters, but it’s those three letters that some people use in order to obfuscate the fact that the actual ideology of the Islamic enemy is Islam, and not some alleged deviant form of it. Western intellectuals and commentators refer to the enemy’s ideology as: “Islamic Fundamentalism,” “Islamic Totalitarianism,” “Islamic Extremism,” “Islamofascism,” “Political Islam,” “Militant Islam,” “Bin Ladenism,” “Islamonazism,” “Radical Islam,” “Islamism”, etc.
The enemy calls it “Islam.”
Imagine, if during past wars, we used terms such as “Radical Nazism”, “Extremist Shinto” and “Militant Communism.” The implication would be that there are “good” versions of those ideologies, which would then lead some to seek out “moderate” Nazis. Those who use terms other than Islam create the impression that it’s some variant of Islam that’s behind the enemy that we’re facing. A term such as “Militant Islam” is redundant, but our politicians continue praising Islam as if it were their own religion.
Bush told us “Islam is peace” after 2,996 Americans were murdered in its name. He maintained that illusion throughout his two terms, and never allowed our soldiers to defeat the enemy. And then came Obama, who told us, from Egypt: “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.” If only he felt that way about America. Washington’s defense of Islam has trumped the defense of America and this dereliction of duty could well be called Islamgate.
Islam is a political religion; the idea of a separation of Mosque and State is unheard of in the Muslim world. Islam has a doctrine of warfare, Jihad, which is fought to establish Sharia Law, which is, by nature, totalitarian. Sharia Law calls for, among other things: the dehumanization of women; the flogging/stoning/killing of adulterers; and the killing of homosexuals, apostates and critics of Islam. All of this is part of orthodox Islam, not some “extremist” form of it. If jihadists were actually “perverting a great religion,” Muslims would have been able to discredit them on Islamic grounds and they would have done so by now. The reason they can’t is because jihadists are acting according to the words of Allah, the Muslim God.
From the Koran: “Slay the idolators wherever you find them.” Chapter 9, verse 5
“When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them.” Chapter 47, verse 4
Beyond the doctrine, there is the historical figure of Mohammad, who, more than anyone, defines Islam. How would you judge a man who lies, cheats, steals, rapes and murders as a way of life? This evil man is Islam’s ideal man, Mohammad.Whatever Mohammad said and did is deemed moral by virtue of the fact that he said it and did it. It’s no accident that the only morality that could sanction his behavior was the one he concocted. Nor is it an accident that Muslims who model themselves after him are the most violent.
For the thirteen years that Mohammad failed to spread Islam by non-violent means, he was not so much peaceful as he was powerless. It was only through criminal activity and with the help of a large gang of followers that he managed to gain power. But he wanted his moral pretense too, so he changed Islam to reflect the fact that the only way it could survive was through force. And so, acting on Allah’s conveniently timed “revelation” that Islam can and should be spread by the sword, Mohammad led an army of Muslims across Arabia in the first jihad. From then on, violence became Islam’s way in the world. And today, acting on Mohammad’s words, “War is deceit”, Muslims use earlier “peaceful” verses from the Koran as a weapon against the ignorance and good will of their victims. Those “peaceful” passages in the Koran were abrogated by later passages calling for eternal war against those who do not submit to Islam.
How Mohammad spread Islam influenced the content of its doctrine and therefore tells us exactly what Islam means.
Note also that the only reason we’re talking about Islam is because we’ve been forced to by its jihad. And where are Islam’s “conscientious objectors”? Nowhere to be found, for even lax Muslims have been silent against jihad. But that doesn’t stop desperate Westerners from pointing to them as representives of “Moderate Islam.” Far from being a personal faith, Islam is a belligerent collectivist ideology that rejects a live-and-let-live attitude towards non-Muslims. And while the jihadists may not represent all Muslims, they do represent Islam.
In the end, most Muslims have proven themselves to be mere sheep to their jihadist wolves, and irrelevant as allies in this war. Former Muslims call the enemy’s ideology Islam, and they dismiss the idea of “Moderate Islam” as they would the idea of “Moderate Evil.” When, based on his actions, Mohammad would be described today as a “Muslim Extremist,” then non-violent Muslims should condemn their prophet and their religion, not those who point it out.
Islam is the enemy’s ideology and evading that fact only helps its agents get away with more murder than they would otherwise. Western politicians and most of our intellectuals have sold us out, so it’s up to the rest of us to defend our way of life by understanding Islam and telling the truth about it in whatever way we can. If we can’t even call Islam by its name, how the hell are we going to defend ourselves against its true believers? I call the enemy what they are, jihadists and stealth jihadists, and the “War on Terror” should be called The War on Jihad.
But behind it all, it’s Islam that makes the enemy tick.
We need to acknowledge Islam’s place in the threat we face and say so without equivocation. Not saying “Islam” helps Islam and hurts us. So we should always call the enemy’s ideology by its actual name.
We need to call Islam Islam.
© Bosch Fawstin

Thursday, June 06, 2019

D-DAY, 75 Years Later

Many of them knew that they were going to die, and they still fought to save the world from the bad guys who wanted to plunge the world into chaos. The debt can never be repaid, but we can honor them, and we can appreciate our freedom more because of men like them. I know full well that I cannot write and draw as I do without U.S. soldiers defending my freedom to do so. Thank You. 

Tuesday, June 04, 2019

Pigman vs The Fixer

I've been a long time fan of Frank Miller, and his work had a lot to do with me choosing to become a cartoonist, particularly The Dark Knight Returns and Daredevil: Born Again. So, a few years after 9/11, when I heard that he was working on a post-9/11 graphic novel featuring Batman taking on Al Qaeda, I was excited, as I had just created my counter-jihad superhero, Pigman, and I had plans to create a series with him, that took on both jihad and Islam. But Miller ended up changing Batman to a character he called "The Fixer", no doubt because DC Comics didn't have the nerve to have one of their franchise characters taking on the Islamic enemy, though Miller claims it was his decision to change Batman to the Fixer. And I question Miller these days, as he's said things which belie positions he's held in the past, such as him once being openly against the leftist Occupy movement, justifiably ripping them a new one in an article on his website, (which led me to honor it in a cartoon) which I think has now disappeared, and which he now regrets, saying that he wasn't in the right state of mind. And, in typical career-saving mode for many entertainers, he has since been trashing Trump to anyone who would listen, not in any principled way, but in the typical leftist way, calling him orange, etc., and in as safe a way as possible for someone wanting to get on the left's good side, after he appeared to be going towards the right. 

And Miller now embarrassingly praises someone as pathetic as Hillary Clinton, even saying that he voted for her twice for president, which he couldn't have, because she was only the nominee once. And there was some backlash to his anti-jihad graphic novel, Holy Terror, with leftists characteristically being on the side of the Islamic enemy, under the guise of "defending Muslims", and trashing Miller as an "Islamophobe". NO one equates Muslims and Jihadists as much as leftists do, yet if they had their way, there would be No comic books taking on the Islamic enemy. If you look at mainstream comic books, post-911, not only is the Islamic enemy Not being taken on, but Marvel and DC have been publishing Muslim superheroes, with NO mention of the ONLY reason we're talking about Islam these days, Jihad. In their fantasy universe, Muslims are Only heroes or victims, never villains. And unfortunately, Miller, in his interviews about Holy Terror, said he didn't know "squat" about Islam, and that his book was merely against al Qaeda. You cannot be against al Qaeda, and not be against Islam, no matter what Miller and others pretend. Al Qaeda, like ISIS, are natural offshoots of Islam, not alleged "anti-islamic" groups, as the worst politicians have stated. And Miller's weak book and weak interviews on them, disappointed me. 

Holy Terror may be his most forgettable read, in that he did not delve deep into what makes the Islamic enemy tick, and it's obvious that he didn't give the story, nor the art, the thought and time that he has given his best projects. It's not enough to take on this enemy, you must do so honestly and thoroughly, and get to the crux of the matter, that "one of the world's great religions" is behind the jihad, the war, against civilization. That Miller felt he needed to make that disclaimer about his book in his interviews, "I don't know squat about islam", proves that he didn't do his necessary homework about the enemy before embarking on this project, and it showed, particularly in its lack of balls that it needed. And someone knew of my criticism of Miller's Holy Terror, and requested this commission of Pigman punching Miller's stand in for Batman, The Fixer, with the Fixer aping what Miller said, and with Pigman shutting him up. 

If you want to read a comic book the takes on not only jihad, but Islam, and the left's political correctness, you can order my Pigman comic books here

Tuesday, May 07, 2019

If Facebook Were Actually Concerned With Violent and Dangerous People On Their Platform...

…they’d be targeting and banning Muslims who, more than any other group, threaten to murder people on their platform. None on Facebook, or in the world, are more violent than Muslims, and they habitually threaten to rape and murder on Facebook, without paying a price for it. 

And I’m well aware that I have no right to be on Facebook, but unlike those who state that fact as if that’s the end all be all, I have the right to criticize Facebook for its fraudulent practices. 

And let me repeat this: I don’t want our corrupt government coming in to regulate a corrupt social media platform. Facebook is justifiably paying a price for its corrupt policies by losing users, and it will eventually pay the ultimate price for it by being supplanted by a far better and more honest platform.  

Thursday, April 25, 2019

If They Were Honest...'s the sign that truthist social(ist) media companies would have when you enter their platforms.

Tuesday, April 16, 2019

"Don't Jump To Conclusions!" -those jumping to conclusions

Sparked by a comment Avi Yemeni made, about how people are warning about jumping to conclusions, While jumping to conclusions.

Saturday, March 30, 2019

The Self-Destruction of Owen Benjamin

He was a comedian. Now, he's ... something else. An unfunny, Jew-hating, flat-earther, "We didn't go to the moon"er nutcase. The best argument against him are his own words. Here's a link to a 4 hour livestream of his, titled "PROOF Ben Shapiro is worse than Hitler", that he did last night, while drinking, praising Hitler, condemning Ben Shapiro and "The Jews", along with who knows what, because I was only able to stomach 15 to 20 minutes.

Saturday, March 23, 2019

Never Forget What "Islamophobia" Actually Is

phobia- a persistent, abnormal, and irrational fear of a specific thing or situation that compels one to avoid it, despite the awareness and reassurance that it is not dangerous.

It’s rational to fear an irrational, political religion like Islam.

“Islamophobia” is a myth like “Islam means peace”, created to shut down criticism of Islam.

A Picture of Mueller When He Began the Investigation

Sunday, March 17, 2019

JK Rowling's "Gay Baiting" Finally Gets Called Out

Well, after a dozen years of signaling to gay fans that some of her characters are gay, and now saying in a recent interview that Dumbledore and someone named Grindelwald had an "intense sexual relationship”, fans are finally calling out J K Rowling for her half-assed "gay baiting". 

Here's a video on how social media is calling her out.

Monday, March 04, 2019

Black Pander

Here's what the announcement for the Oscars nominating Black Panther for Best Picture would have looked like, if they slipped up and were honest. The judges are film snobs who look down on superhero movies, but they felt that they Had to nominate it because of its majority black cast. Again, it's a good movie, as far as superhero movies go, but Best Picture? No.

Friday, March 01, 2019

Coca-Cola becomes Islam Cola

The ONLY reason we're talking about Islam is Jihad, so when any company, or movie studio, or TV studio or comic book company, etc., show Muslims, the fact that we are currently being warred upon by devout Muslims who are on the warpath SHOULD be acknowledged. If not, then it's PURE enemy propaganda, via non-Muslims. There was a time when enemy propaganda was exclusively produced by our enemies. Now, it's produced by our domestic enemies on the left. What other religion gets this kind of tribute by a soda company? None. Because the ONLY reason the rat bastards behind this are doing it is in order to tell the Islamic enemy, "Don't hurt us! See, we like you." It's grotesque dishonesty and cowardice, and thanks to Hugh Fitzgerald at Jihad Watch for bringing it to everyone's attention.

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

My Interview on Unsafe Space

I just did an interview that you can watch on Youtube on the Unsafe Space channel, and I think it’s the best, most comprehensive one I’ve done. Check it out, and if you like it, please share it. Thanks. 

Sunday, January 20, 2019


Gillette could have saved themselves a lot of time and money, and gotten to their point a lot faster, with an ad by me. IF I were a self-loathing male.

Sunday, December 16, 2018

Subscribe to My YouTube Channel

Before I get banned on any more platforms, consider subscribing  to my YouTube challenge. I play to begin doing video commentary soon, and I promise that I won't open my videos by staring into my camera for too long and wasting your time. Thanks in advance. You can subscribe here.