Saturday, December 15, 2007


That’s the gist of Islam’s position against non-Muslims.
Unbelief in Islam being the single greatest crime of all, and so Infidels are criminals who need to be brought to Islamic justice, by conversion, subjugation or death.

When you hear some rat from CAIR speak about how Islam doesn't condone the killing of innocents, what they mean by innocents are Muslims.
This is the essence of what we’re facing if the enemy is ever allowed to acquire power over us. Seeing what they do when they have no power tells us what they’ll do if they ever get it.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007


From the Koran, chapter 4, verse 34:

'Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them, forsake them in beds apart, and beat them....'

Notice how it's written that if a man merely fears disobedience from 'his' woman, he can then beat her.
It's important to know that these passages exist in the Koran and that Muslim wifebeaters[wivesbeaters] can Islamically justify their behavior by these 'words of Allah', but when it comes down to it, it does not matter in the entire scheme of things that the Koran sanctions the beating of women because that very sanction, among Many others, delegitimizes Islam as a belief system worthy of respect.

Sunday, December 02, 2007

In The Meantime....

I won't be able to get any posts on the blog until next week, as I'm currently working on images for something special that came my way, will fill you all in when the time comes.

Here's an older drawing, a panel from an art class assignment.

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Islamic 'Peace'

"Islam means peace"? What does Islamic peace mean?

By Bassam Tibi, a Western Muslim scholar of jihad:

‘At its core, Islam is a religious mission to all humanity. Muslims are religiously obliged to disseminate the Islamic faith throughout the world. "We have sent you forth to all mankind" (Q. 34:28). If non-Muslims submit to conversion or subjugation, this call (da’wa) can be pursued peacefully. If they do not, Muslims are obliged to wage war against them. In Islam, peace requires that non-Muslims submit to the call of Islam, either by converting or by accepting the status of a religious minority (dhimmi) and paying the imposed poll tax, jizya. World peace, the final stage of the da’wa, is reached only with the conversion or submission of all mankind to Islam…Muslims believe that expansion through war is not aggression but a fulfillment of the Qur’anic command to spread Islam as a way of peace. The resort to force to disseminate Islam is not war (harb), a word that is used only to describe the use of force by non-Muslims. Islamic wars are not hurab (the plural of harb) but rather futuhat, acts of “opening” the world to Islam and expressing Islamic jihad. Relations between dar al-Islam, the home of peace, and dar al-harb, the world of unbelievers, nevertheless take place in a state of war, according to the Qur’an and to the authoritative commentaries of Islamic jurists. Unbelievers who stand in the way, creating obstacles for the da’wa, are blamed for this state of war, for the da’wa can be pursued peacefully if others submit to it.

In other words, those who resist Islam cause wars and are responsible for them.'

Sunday, November 18, 2007


Here's an audio version of Muslim Roulette.

Islam vs Muslims.

I'm writing this in order to clarify my stand against Islam and its true believers, as I don't want to be unnecessarily misunderstood by those of good will if I can help it.

A is A. Islam is Islam.

There is no such thing as ‘Good’ Islam vs ‘Bad’ Islam.

Islam is a totalitarian religion, while Muslims are individual human beings who may or may not practice Islam faithfully. I’ve come to the conclusion that there are active Muslims and there are passive Muslims, the faithful and the unfaithful, the submitted and the un-submitted in Islam, but there is No obvious way to tell the difference between them, which has its benefits for those who are committed to spreading Islam by any means necessary. Mohammed said ‘War is deceit’ and practiced it, and Muslims have followed their leader in using deception against non-Muslims to this day. When Islam, the very antithesis of peace, is sold to us by Muslims and their useful idiots as being the very definition of peace, and actually gains traction, it would have made Hitler blush.

That Islam must be misrepresented by Muslims in order to appear at all appealing to non-Muslims speaks volumes, and its purpose is to make Islam appear harmless until it’s too late. And the enemy’s major weapon against us is us. From our multiculturalism which the unicultural enemy exploits, to our crippling political correctness which ‘protects’ us from the truth we need to know and act upon, to our irrational tolerance of the intolerant. Another weapon the enemy uses against us is that the majority of Muslims are Muslims in name only, and the false perception that they themselves represent Islam makes Islam look good. But they do not embody Islam, they are not its true, consistent practitioners. They are hacks when it comes to doing their Islamic duty as the Koran demands of them. And then there are those who are moderately Islamic, but who advertise themselves as ‘Moderate Muslims’, who have hijacked the normatively immoderate Islam, not by thoroughly repudiating the inherent violence within Islam, but by merely mouthing the words ‘Islam means peace’, and allowing our desire to believe it to do the rest.

The widespread usage of the term ‘Moderate Muslim’ is a tacit confession of Islam’s extremism.

When’s the last time you heard the term ‘Moderate Christian’? Moderate Jew? Moderate Hindu? Moderate Buddhist?

But let me add this, after making it clear that Muslims are individuals who may or may not be following Islam: Most Muslims have shown us that when it comes down to it, the majority of them will side with Islam against the non-Muslim world, no matter what. They’ve made it clear, in their indifferent silence and inaction in the face of the daily horrors committed in their religion’s name, that in the end, they don’t give a damn about anything except Islam and its reputation. I’ve read one too many accounts of Muslims whose first response after a particularly horrific Muslim terrorist attack, was to run to the rescue of Islam, the ideological source of the attack itself. ‘Education by Murder’, as Daniel Pipes* writes of it. The price we're paying for not knowing the full truth about Islam is too high, but it looks like it will take more death and destruction for the civilized world to learn about Islam and the evil at the heart of it before we are ready to ruthlessly act on our behalf against it.

*About Pipes, I appreciate his efforts against Jihad and I know that counter-jihadists don’t necessarily have to agree with every conclusion we as individuals arrive at, so long as the big picture is in sight…… but his unwarranted preoccupation with ‘Moderate Islam’ is a Pipes Dream, it is his subjective wishes overstepping reality. There is no such thing as ‘Moderate Islam’, there is only Islam. And that there may be moderate Muslims doesn’t exonerate Islam, which was built to be even Muslim proof. When a Muslim concedes the Islamic point that the Koran is the verbatim word of allah, who is he to deem himself to be allah’s editor?

No, Muslims will only rethink Islam, will only consider transforming the religion, when their desire to destroy the non-Muslim world is trumped by their desire to survive.

© 2007 Bosch Fawstin

Here's some additional thoughts I recently wrote up on this topic:

Can anyone tell which Muslim will go jihad before he or she does?

Non-Muslim Muslims, or as some call them “Moderate Muslims,” give the Jihadist enemy cover. They’re pointed to as “proof” that violence has nothing to do with Islam when, in fact, non-violent Muslims are reluctant Muslims. And they’re the reason we’re playing a game of Muslim Roulette in the middle of the Muslim world’s jihad on us. While we’d like to discriminate between “moderate Muslims,” “extremist Muslims,” etc., Muslims see us as Infidels, period. Not moderate Infidels, extremist infidels, etc., but simply Infidels.
Since 9/11 – a day that FAR too many Muslims celebrated – we’ve been expected to treat Muslims as if they’re not only above reproach, but as if it’s racist or “Islamophobic” to consider for an instant that any Muslim might be up to no good; that they’re All innocent no matter how many of them have been proven guilty of engaging in or supporting jihad.
When our government bureaucrats tell us “If you see something, say something,” they rely on us to be the ones to decide what that means, in order to protect themselves from accusations of “Islamophobia.” Islam is an ideology, not a race, so what we’re supposed to be looking for gets very complicated, since, in addition to Arab Muslims, there are white, black, Hispanic, female, blond-haired, red-haired, and blue-eyed Muslims as well. This is not a call to condemn all those who call themselves Muslims, (though a good Muslim by our standards is a bad Muslim-or non-Muslim- by Islamic standards) it’s just a reminder that we need to be better able to detect killer Muslims before they kill. And that’s the job our government should be engaged in — not protecting Muslim feelings, but protecting American lives.

Update: January 16, 2017 (ten years after I originally wrote this, Wow): I just had to add that after each Islamic attack, we find out that the authorities, here or overseas, know about the mass murderer, and were watching him or her. So many of these attacks could have been averted, yet it's the politically correct shackles the West has placed on itself which allow these mass murderers to pull off their attacks. 

Islam's Useful Idiots

I just posted this on a forum in response to a few of Islam's useful idiots:

One of the reasons [besides sheer laziness and intellectual dishonesty] why the non-Muslim useful idiots of Islam do not do their homework on Islam is that a part of them knows that they would not be able to maintain the illusions they're currently clinging to about the world we live in. So in the name of maintaining those illusions, they will be silent about the daily horrors we see coming from the Muslim world and direct all of their judgment against those who know what they're desperately trying not to know.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007


That was my response to this Dhimmi Watch post, and it was deleted because it was deemed innapropriate. I figured if it was worth deleting, then it was worth posting here. My response to their deleting it:

'It was just another way of saying that England's in deep camel dung in its preemptive submission to Muslims.'

It is the People of the West who are going to pay for these absolutely unnecessary preemptive concessions to an enemy who sees every single last one of them as a clear invitation to push for more. The enemy's sense of entitlement grows by the day in a civilization they have No place in.

Jihad Watch and Dhimmi Watch are indispensable in the war against jihad and Robert Spencer's mention of The Infidel on his site was much appreciated by me, but I gotta say I was a little surprised to have my simple response deleted, with this reason being given:

'Nothing personal. It's just that "camel" jokes about Muslims aren't appropriate here.'
Marisol SeiboldJihad Watch News Editor

I think deleting it is inappropriate considering we're at war with Muslims because They're at war with Us, and a joke at their expense is just a hint at what we need to start hearing from a Lot more people. They can hate us and insult us and spit on us and we suffer these daily outrages while the more consistent practitioners among them KILL us...... and get Away with it......and they, the passive Muslims in silent assent in the face of all of this horror, are to remain immune from even ridicule? Why? Because it's not the passive Muslims these concessions are being made for, [even though they can't WAIT to accept them] it's the Active ones who have gotten them from political cowards through aggression. The lesson the enemy gets loud and clear is that Jihad works on cowards in power and they will act accordingly.


If you're interested in starting topics and asking questions regarding The Infidel/Pigman, you can do so at my website's forum:

Sunday, October 14, 2007

Jihad Watch on The Infidel & Pigman

Robert Spencer over at Jihad Watch recently posted about The Infidel & Pigman at his indispensable site, which I thank him again for. For those visitors to this site who have not seen or read the Jihad Watch mention, here's the link, along with some of my answers to questions regarding where I'm coming from with my story in the comments field.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

The Islamic Empire State Building?

I don’t usually post when I’m livid, but here I am. New York City’s Great skyscraper, The Empire State Building, the one that’s left standing, is turning green.............turning green in 'tribute' to Islam for a Muslim holiday, green being Mo’s favorite color. I don’t care if it goes green for a second, that’s a second too long.

And what, EXACTLY, did Islam DO to earn this extravagant kind of tribute?

Islam, through its most consistent practitioners, has committed over 9,000 terrorist acts since it last paid 'tribute' to us on 9/11/01.

And where are the comparative tributes to America and Western Civilization to be found in the Muslim world?
Have any of you seen the Kabaa, that big, black ‘holy’ box in Mecca, go red, white and blue in tribute to us anytime recently?

We’re taking it people, we’re taking it real good on all sides from the enemy, all because those who are in charge of defending our culture from this kind of outrage are busy praying five times a day that ‘Islam means peace’.

Monday, October 08, 2007

Welcome, Cox & Forkum fans

I want to thank Allen Forkum again for linking me to his and John Cox's great website. As with all of you, the news that they packed it in hit me hard. I relied on their inimitable take on the days events during this war and I already miss the hell out of their work. But, as I wrote to Allen, I expect them to make a dramatic return because the events that are coming will make their blood boil enough to Have to respond artistically on a regular basis again. They do deserve a break, but I'd bet it's not a permanent one.

Sunday, October 07, 2007

ATLAS SHRUGGED 50th Anniversary

I was at the biggest, greatest birthday party I ever attended in Washington, D.C. all day yesterday. It was the 50th anniversary of Ayn Rand's literary and philosophical masterpiece, Atlas Shrugged, and put together by The Atlas Society. While Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead is my favorite novel, her Atlas Shrugged is the Greatest novel I've ever read. I make this distinction because saying that they're Both my favorite novels doesn't work. I really don't know how to put it all in words how I felt yesterday, so I'll just say that it was as great a day as I expected it to be considering the matchless achievement that is Atlas Shrugged.

Friday, October 05, 2007

Will be gone for two days.

Tell you about it when I get back.

'Moderate' Makeover...

...of an Extreme religion.

Here are some thoughts of mine on Islam's 'moderates'.

Islam is teaching us every day about what it actually is through the behavior of its most devout followers.

One problem for ‘Moderate Muslims' is that they're referred to as 'Moderate Muslims', so as to distance themselves from their normatively extreme religion and from immoderate Muslims such as Mohammad. It is the specter of Mohammad that looms over individual Muslims' fanciful ideas about their own religion.
We must understand the nature of the man behind Islam to know what Islam means.

Mohammad, the self-styled ‘prophet’, was a Killer. Not metaphorically, but literally. Mohammad actually committed the violence that the Koran preaches, and even had his critics killed. I don't give a rat's ass what out of context 'good' he may have done in light of this historical fact. Once a belief system sanctions violence against All those who are not under its control, any pretext at virtue is just that.

That Mohammad is seen as The Perfect Model for All of Mankind according to Islam makes matters even worse and transfigures his thuggery, in the minds of the submitted. And this Jihad that Mohammad began when he lost faith in his ability to spread Islam through the word, this call to arms against the entire non-Muslim world, had no expiration date. Jihad is an Eternal standing order for Muslims to wage a holy war against non-Muslims UNTIL All of mankind are Allah’s slaves.

Not only do most Muslims ignore this call to jihad, a good thing, but then they lie to us about it or pretend that it doesn't exist, and our desire to join them in this pretense tells them that they can continue to sit on their asses in silent neutrality as the world burns in the name of Islam, a religion they purport to adhere to. The Muslim 'moderates' don't have Islam on their side, which is why they're Islamically impotent to fight the jihadists and don't even attempt to. So instead, they can indulge in their own private Islam that has nothing to do with Islam and pretend that their prophet was not a malevolent man.

© 2007 Bosch Fawstin

Monday, September 24, 2007

My Interview with Shire Network News

Shire Network News is my favorite podcast and we discuss The Infidel & Pigman, recorded 9/11/07.

You can subscribe to it through itunes as well.

Friday, August 10, 2007

Tuesday, August 07, 2007


I just opened up 'BOSCH FAWSTIN'S STAND,' my online cafepress store, featuring Pigman. It's a way for me to spread the word about THE INFIDEL, so if you're interested, spread the word. Here's the link: