This is my design for The Fallaci, named after Orianna Fallaci, for The Blogmocracy Awards. I was mainly aware of Orianna Fallaci as one of the most uncompromising truth tellers about Islam in this post 9-11 world. Check out my design for their Icarus award as well.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Saturday, January 30, 2010
MARTYR?
Labels:
Cartoon Jihad,
Islam,
Jihad,
Killian Duke,
Pigman,
The Infidel
Friday, January 29, 2010
DUKE
Labels:
Cartoon Jihad,
Islam,
Jihad,
Killian Duke,
Pigman,
The Infidel
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
B.O.'s Mad Dog Ballet Dancer
Update: Obama's former Chief of Staff Infection now looking to further infect Chicago as Mayor.
Rahm Emanuel, Obama's Chief of Staff, Behind Closed Doors. Even fellow leftists are now at war with him.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Non-Muslim Terrorist Submits to Islam
No matter what non-terrorist Muslims say, most terrorists are Muslim & so Carlos the Jackal finally joined the crowd. Some have questioned his sincerity, but note that a terrrorist can become a Muslim without renouncing terrorism.
Monday, January 25, 2010
mcCHRYSTAL's METHod of war: Stop Fighting
The enemy will never submit to anything other than Islam or to our deadly force. It’s not surprising that General McChrystal was hand picked by Obama, a man who isn’t comfortable with the word “victory.” We haven’t even begun to fight against Jihad and this “soldier” doesn’t have any more fight left in him. What a disgrace.
Sunday, January 24, 2010
The Jazz Ban Man
Here's my take on Charles Johnson & his Lizard army, of the formerly valuable website, Little Green Footballs. I'm one of those who had the honor of being banned by him for questioning him about his growing disinterest in the counter-jihad movement. I think he felt bad after 9/11 and when he stopped feeling bad, he reverted back to his leftist self, deciding that it's far safer to have right wing enemies than it is to have Muslim or leftist ones.Saturday, January 23, 2010
Friday, January 22, 2010
Obama's War On......
Obama's War on Banks Video
Obama's War on Republicans Video
Obama's War on the Insurance Industry
Obama's War on Wall Street
Obama's War on Fox News
Obams's War on Capitalism
Obama's War on America
Obama's War on Reality, Ongoing
Obama's War on the Insurance Industry
Obama's War on Wall Street
Obama's War on Fox News
Obams's War on Capitalism
Obama's War on America
Obama's War on Reality, Ongoing
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
it's about TIME!
This was published Jan, 2010:
That's an actual title of a Time Magazine piece......Time Magazine......Time Magazine....
That's an actual title of a Time Magazine piece......Time Magazine......Time Magazine....
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
"I'M GEERT WILDERS!"
Geert Wilders will go on trial tomorrow for being the only Western leader on earth to tell the truth about Islam and its threat to us. He's up against the scum of the earth, and even though he has The Truth on his side, it might not be enough, for as one of his prosecutors puts it:
"It is irrelevant whether Wilder’s witnesses might prove Wilders’ observations to be correct. What’s relevant is that his observations are illegal."
This is the trial of the century, and the verdict will either be a victory for freedom or for Islam.
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Friday, January 15, 2010
An Honest Moment
Thanks to Joe "You Lie!" Wilson, with apologies to "The Most Interesting Man in the World."
Thursday, January 14, 2010
CHANGE......the subject
...or get tuned out.
Obama has not held a full news conference at the White House since July 22, the night he [stupidly] said that the Cambridge Police "acted stupidly" in the arrest of [elitist, race-hustling punk] Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. More...
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
MR. COOL
Labels:
America,
Appeasement,
Barack Obama,
Iran,
Islam,
Islamic Peace,
Obama,
Terrorism
Monday, January 11, 2010
Sunday, January 10, 2010
CALLING ISLAM "ISLAM"
-Bosch Fawstin
Western intellectuals and commentators refer to the enemy's ideology as:
"Islamic Fundamentalism", "Islamic Extremism", "Totalitarian Islam", "Islamofascism", "Political Islam", "Militant Islam", "Bin Ladenism", "Islamonazism", "Radical Islam", "Islamism", etc....
The enemy calls it "Islam".
Imagine, if during past wars, we used terms such as "Radical Nazism", "Extremist Shinto" and "Militant Communism". Those who use terms other than "Islam" create the impression that it's some variant of Islam that's behind the enemy that we're facing. A term such as "Militant Islam" is redundant, but our politicians continue praising Islam as if it were their own religion. Bush told us, "Islam means peace" -- after 2,996 Americans were murdered in its name. He maintained that illusion throughout his two terms, and never allowed our soldiers to defeat the enemy. And now we have Obama, who tells us, from Egypt: “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." Washington's defense of Islam has trumped the defense of America and this dereliction of duty could well be called Islamgate.
Islam is a political religion; the idea of a separation of Mosque and state is unheard of in the Muslim world. Islam has a doctrine of warfare, Jihad, which is fought in order to establish Islamic ("Sharia") Law, which is, by nature, totalitarian. Sharia Law calls for, among other things: the dehumanization of women; the flogging/stoning/killing of adulterers; and the killing of homosexuals, apostates and critics of Islam. All of this is part of orthodox Islam, not some "extremist" form of it. If jihadists were actually "perverting a great religion", Muslims would have been able to discredit them on Islamic grounds and they would have done so by now. The reason they can't is because jihadists are acting according to the words of Allah, the Muslim God. From the Koran:
"Slay the idolators wherever you find them..." Chapter 9, verse 5
"When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them...." Ch. 47:4
Beyond the doctrine, there is the historical figure of Mohammad, who, more than anyone, defines Islam. How would you judge a man who lies, cheats, steals, rapes and murders as a way of life? This evil man is Islam's ideal man, Mohammad. Whatever he said and did is deemed moral by virtue of the fact that he said it and did it. It's no accident that the only morality that could sanction his behavior was his own. Nor is it an accident that Muslims who model themselves after him are the most violent. For the 13 years that Mohammad failed to spread Islam by non-violent means, he was not so much peaceful as he was powerless. It was only through criminal activity that he gained power and a large gang of followers. But he wanted his moral pretense, too, so he changed Islam to reflect the fact that the only way it could survive was through force. And so, acting on Allah's conveniently timed "revelation" that Islam can and should be spread by the sword, Mohammad led an army of Muslims across Arabia in the first jihad. From then on, violence became Islam's way in the world. And today, acting on Mohammad's words, "War is deceit", Muslims use earlier "peaceful" verses from the Koran as a weapon against the ignorance and good will of their victims. Those "peaceful" passages in the Koran were abrogated by later passages calling for eternal war against those who do not submit to Islam. How Mohammad spread Islam influenced the content of its doctrine and therefore tells us exactly what Islam means.
Note also that the only reason we're talking about Islam is because we've been forced to by its jihad. And where are Islam's "conscientious objectors"? Nowhere to be found, for even lax Muslims have been silent against jihad. But that doesn't stop desperate Westerners from pointing to them as representives of "Moderate Islam". Far from being a personal faith, Islam is a collectivist ideology that rejects a live-and-let-live attitude towards non-Muslims. And while the jihadists may not represent all Muslims, they do represent Islam. In the end, most Muslims have proven themselves to be mere sheep to their jihadist wolves, irrelevant as allies in this war. Recovering Muslims call the enemy's ideology "Islam", and they dismiss the idea of "Moderate Islam" as they would the idea of "Moderate Evil". When, based on his actions, Mohammad would be described today as a "Muslim Extremist", then non-violent Muslims should condemn their prophet and their religion, not those who point it out.
Islam is the enemy's ideology and evading that fact only helps its agents get away with more murder than they would otherwise. Western politicians have sold us out, so it's up to the rest of us to defend our way of life by understanding Islam and telling the truth about it in whatever way we can. If we can't even call Islam by its name, how the hell are we going to defend ourselves against its true believers? One could argue that we'd be better off if the West would just choose one of the many terms currently used for the enemy's ideology. For my part, I call the enemy what they are, "Jihadists", and our response, "The War on Jihad." But behind it all, it's Islam that makes the enemy tick.
Despite my frustrations with the refusal of many to call Islam "Islam", I know that those who speak out against Jihad put themselves in danger, and I respect their courage. But it's important that we acknowledge Islam's place in the threat we face and say so without equivocation. Not saying "Islam" helps Islam and hurts us. So let's begin calling the enemy's ideology by its name. Let's start calling Islam "Islam."
Western intellectuals and commentators refer to the enemy's ideology as:
"Islamic Fundamentalism", "Islamic Extremism", "Totalitarian Islam", "Islamofascism", "Political Islam", "Militant Islam", "Bin Ladenism", "Islamonazism", "Radical Islam", "Islamism", etc....
The enemy calls it "Islam".
Imagine, if during past wars, we used terms such as "Radical Nazism", "Extremist Shinto" and "Militant Communism". Those who use terms other than "Islam" create the impression that it's some variant of Islam that's behind the enemy that we're facing. A term such as "Militant Islam" is redundant, but our politicians continue praising Islam as if it were their own religion. Bush told us, "Islam means peace" -- after 2,996 Americans were murdered in its name. He maintained that illusion throughout his two terms, and never allowed our soldiers to defeat the enemy. And now we have Obama, who tells us, from Egypt: “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." Washington's defense of Islam has trumped the defense of America and this dereliction of duty could well be called Islamgate.
Islam is a political religion; the idea of a separation of Mosque and state is unheard of in the Muslim world. Islam has a doctrine of warfare, Jihad, which is fought in order to establish Islamic ("Sharia") Law, which is, by nature, totalitarian. Sharia Law calls for, among other things: the dehumanization of women; the flogging/stoning/killing of adulterers; and the killing of homosexuals, apostates and critics of Islam. All of this is part of orthodox Islam, not some "extremist" form of it. If jihadists were actually "perverting a great religion", Muslims would have been able to discredit them on Islamic grounds and they would have done so by now. The reason they can't is because jihadists are acting according to the words of Allah, the Muslim God. From the Koran:
"Slay the idolators wherever you find them..." Chapter 9, verse 5
"When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them...." Ch. 47:4
Beyond the doctrine, there is the historical figure of Mohammad, who, more than anyone, defines Islam. How would you judge a man who lies, cheats, steals, rapes and murders as a way of life? This evil man is Islam's ideal man, Mohammad. Whatever he said and did is deemed moral by virtue of the fact that he said it and did it. It's no accident that the only morality that could sanction his behavior was his own. Nor is it an accident that Muslims who model themselves after him are the most violent. For the 13 years that Mohammad failed to spread Islam by non-violent means, he was not so much peaceful as he was powerless. It was only through criminal activity that he gained power and a large gang of followers. But he wanted his moral pretense, too, so he changed Islam to reflect the fact that the only way it could survive was through force. And so, acting on Allah's conveniently timed "revelation" that Islam can and should be spread by the sword, Mohammad led an army of Muslims across Arabia in the first jihad. From then on, violence became Islam's way in the world. And today, acting on Mohammad's words, "War is deceit", Muslims use earlier "peaceful" verses from the Koran as a weapon against the ignorance and good will of their victims. Those "peaceful" passages in the Koran were abrogated by later passages calling for eternal war against those who do not submit to Islam. How Mohammad spread Islam influenced the content of its doctrine and therefore tells us exactly what Islam means.
Note also that the only reason we're talking about Islam is because we've been forced to by its jihad. And where are Islam's "conscientious objectors"? Nowhere to be found, for even lax Muslims have been silent against jihad. But that doesn't stop desperate Westerners from pointing to them as representives of "Moderate Islam". Far from being a personal faith, Islam is a collectivist ideology that rejects a live-and-let-live attitude towards non-Muslims. And while the jihadists may not represent all Muslims, they do represent Islam. In the end, most Muslims have proven themselves to be mere sheep to their jihadist wolves, irrelevant as allies in this war. Recovering Muslims call the enemy's ideology "Islam", and they dismiss the idea of "Moderate Islam" as they would the idea of "Moderate Evil". When, based on his actions, Mohammad would be described today as a "Muslim Extremist", then non-violent Muslims should condemn their prophet and their religion, not those who point it out.
Islam is the enemy's ideology and evading that fact only helps its agents get away with more murder than they would otherwise. Western politicians have sold us out, so it's up to the rest of us to defend our way of life by understanding Islam and telling the truth about it in whatever way we can. If we can't even call Islam by its name, how the hell are we going to defend ourselves against its true believers? One could argue that we'd be better off if the West would just choose one of the many terms currently used for the enemy's ideology. For my part, I call the enemy what they are, "Jihadists", and our response, "The War on Jihad." But behind it all, it's Islam that makes the enemy tick.
Despite my frustrations with the refusal of many to call Islam "Islam", I know that those who speak out against Jihad put themselves in danger, and I respect their courage. But it's important that we acknowledge Islam's place in the threat we face and say so without equivocation. Not saying "Islam" helps Islam and hurts us. So let's begin calling the enemy's ideology by its name. Let's start calling Islam "Islam."
Saturday, January 09, 2010
"...Behead him like a Pig."
Pigman's responding to this story.
Artwork is from an index card sketch of Pigman that I slip into copies of my book PROPIGANDA.
Thursday, January 07, 2010
TOUGH CRITIC
Killian & Muslim 'critic' in an outtake from The Infidel.
To new blog visitors, Killian Duke is the hero of my upcoming graphic novel, The Infidel. His Muslim background comes to the forefront of his life on 9-11, and he responds by creating the ruthless counter-jihad superhero Pigman. And the daggers of his Muslim critics are as metaphorical as this Koran passage:
"When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them...." Ch. 47:4
For Mohammad's violent history kills the pc myth that the violent passages in the Koran are metaphorical.
Tuesday, January 05, 2010
MRS. PIGMAN
Labels:
9-11,
Frank Warner,
Pigman,
September 11th,
The Infidel
Sunday, January 03, 2010
2010: YEAR OF THE PIG
THE INFIDEL BEGINS in 2010
Pigman index card pencil/ink sketch which I slip into orders of PROPIGANDA
Labels:
Pigman,
The Infidel
PIGMAN t-shirts [& more] @ Patriot Web Stores are now Cheaper
White t's which were $16.99 are now $13.99
Black/colored t's which were $19.99 are now $16.15
Patriot Web Stores
Black/colored t's which were $19.99 are now $16.15
Patriot Web Stores
Friday, January 01, 2010
THE INFIDEL 2010
THE INFIDEL graphic novel will begin in 2010:
A story about twin brothers, Killian Duke and Salaam Duka, whose Muslim background comes to the forefront of their lives on 9/11. Killian responds to the attacks by creating a counter-jihad superhero comic book called Pigman, as Salaam surrenders to Islam and becomes a Born Again Muslim, following the faith to wherever it leads him. The Pigman story is the comic book within the graphic novel that's a super echo of the main story.
Here's a look at the main characters from The Infidel

In the meantime, I currently have available a collection of my blog work promoting The Infidel, which includes a number of essays on the threat we face, called ProPiganda: Drawing the Line Against Jihad, which mainly features Pigman giving the enemy what they deserve, in word and deed.
So thanks for visiting, take a look around and leave your thoughts.
Labels:
The Infidel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





























