Sunday, January 31, 2010

THE FALLACI

This is my design for The Fallaci, named after Orianna Fallaci, for The Blogmocracy Awards. I was mainly aware of Orianna Fallaci as one of the most uncompromising truth tellers about Islam in this post 9-11 world. Check out my design for their Icarus award as well.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

MARTYR?

Not Without a Fight

Killian Duke, hero of my graphic novel, The Infidel. He creates the Pigman comic book after 9-11, and he gives as good as he gets.

Friday, January 29, 2010

DUKE

Killian Duke, hero of my graphic nove The Infidel, in a panel from the book. He creates the comic book superhero, Pigman, after 9-11.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Non-Muslim Terrorist Submits to Islam

No matter what non-terrorist Muslims say, most terrorists are Muslim & so Carlos the Jackal finally joined the crowd. Some have questioned his sincerity, but note that a terrrorist can become a Muslim without renouncing terrorism.

Monday, January 25, 2010

mcCHRYSTAL's METHod of war: Stop Fighting

The enemy will never submit to anything other than Islam or to our deadly force. It’s not surprising that General McChrystal was hand picked by Obama, a man who isn’t comfortable with the word “victory.” We haven’t even begun to fight against Jihad and this “soldier” doesn’t have any more fight left in him. What a disgrace.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

The Jazz Ban Man


Here's my take on Charles Johnson & his Lizard army, of the formerly valuable website, Little Green Footballs. I'm one of those who had the honor of being banned by him for questioning him about his growing disinterest in the counter-jihad movement. I think he felt bad after 9/11 and when he stopped feeling bad, he reverted back to his leftist self, deciding that it's far safer to have right wing enemies than it is to have Muslim or leftist ones.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Obama's War On......


Obama's War on Banks Video
Obama's War on Republicans Video
Obama's War on the Insurance Industry
Obama's War on Wall Street
Obama's War on Fox News
Obams's War on Capitalism
Obama's War on America
Obama's War on Reality, Ongoing

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

"I'M GEERT WILDERS!"

Geert Wilders will go on trial tomorrow for being the only Western leader on earth to tell the truth about Islam and its threat to us. He's up against the scum of the earth, and even though he has The Truth on his side, it might not be enough, for as one of his prosecutors puts it:

"It is irrelevant whether Wilder’s witnesses might prove Wilders’ observations to be correct. What’s relevant is that his observations are illegal."

This is the trial of the century, and the verdict will either be a victory for freedom or for Islam.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Thursday, January 14, 2010

CHANGE......the subject

































...or get tuned out.

Obama has not held a full news conference at the White House since July 22, the night he [stupidly] said that the Cambridge Police "acted stupidly" in the arrest of [elitist, race-hustling punk] Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. More...

Monday, January 11, 2010

eRacism















If you're Communist, Socialist, Egalitarian, Leftist, Collectivist, Democrat & Harry Reid, then your racism is erased.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

CALLING ISLAM "ISLAM"

-Bosch Fawstin

Western intellectuals and commentators refer to the enemy's ideology as:


"Islamic Fundamentalism", "Islamic Extremism", "Totalitarian Islam", "Islamofascism", "Political Islam", "Militant Islam", "Bin Ladenism", "Islamonazism", "Radical Islam", "Islamism", etc....


The enemy calls it "Islam".


Imagine, if during past wars, we used terms such as "Radical Nazism", "Extremist Shinto" and "Militant Communism". Those who use terms other than "Islam" create the impression that it's some variant of Islam that's behind the enemy that we're facing. A term such as "Militant Islam" is redundant, but our politicians continue praising Islam as if it were their own religion. Bush told us, "Islam means peace" -- after 2,996 Americans were murdered in its name. He maintained that illusion throughout his two terms, and never allowed our soldiers to defeat the enemy. And now we have Obama, who tells us, from Egypt: “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." Washington's defense of Islam has trumped the defense of America and this dereliction of duty could well be called Islamgate.


Islam is a political religion; the idea of a separation of Mosque and state is unheard of in the Muslim world. Islam has a doctrine of warfare, Jihad, which is fought in order to establish Islamic ("Sharia") Law, which is, by nature, totalitarian. Sharia Law calls for, among other things: the dehumanization of women; the flogging/stoning/killing of adulterers; and the killing of homosexuals, apostates and critics of Islam. All of this is part of orthodox Islam, not some "extremist" form of it. If jihadists were actually "perverting a great religion", Muslims would have been able to discredit them on Islamic grounds and they would have done so by now. The reason they can't is because jihadists are acting according to the words of Allah, the Muslim God. From the Koran:


"Slay the idolators wherever you find them..." Chapter 9, verse 5



"When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them...." Ch. 47:4

Beyond the doctrine, there is the historical figure of Mohammad, who, more than anyone, defines Islam. How would you judge a man who lies, cheats, steals, rapes and murders as a way of life? This evil man is Islam's ideal man, Mohammad. Whatever he said and did is deemed moral by virtue of the fact that he said it and did it. It's no accident that the only morality that could sanction his behavior was his own. Nor is it an accident that Muslims who model themselves after him are the most violent. For the 13 years that Mohammad failed to spread Islam by non-violent means, he was not so much peaceful as he was powerless. It was only through criminal activity that he gained power and a large gang of followers. But he wanted his moral pretense, too, so he changed Islam to reflect the fact that the only way it could survive was through force. And so, acting on Allah's conveniently timed "revelation" that Islam can and should be spread by the sword, Mohammad led an army of Muslims across Arabia in the first jihad. From then on, violence became Islam's way in the world. And today, acting on Mohammad's words, "War is deceit", Muslims use earlier "peaceful" verses from the Koran as a weapon against the ignorance and good will of their victims. Those "peaceful" passages in the Koran were abrogated by later passages calling for eternal war against those who do not submit to Islam. How Mohammad spread Islam influenced the content of its doctrine and therefore tells us exactly what Islam means.


Note also that the only reason we're talking about Islam is because we've been forced to by its jihad. And where are Islam's "conscientious objectors"? Nowhere to be found, for even lax Muslims have been silent against jihad. But that doesn't stop desperate Westerners from pointing to them as representives of "Moderate Islam". Far from being a personal faith, Islam is a collectivist ideology that rejects a live-and-let-live attitude towards non-Muslims. And while the jihadists may not represent all Muslims, they do represent Islam. In the end, most Muslims have proven themselves to be mere sheep to their jihadist wolves, irrelevant as allies in this war. Recovering Muslims call the enemy's ideology "Islam", and they dismiss the idea of "Moderate Islam" as they would the idea of "Moderate Evil". When, based on his actions, Mohammad would be described today as a "Muslim Extremist", then non-violent Muslims should condemn their prophet and their religion, not those who point it out.


Islam is the enemy's ideology and evading that fact only helps its agents get away with more murder than they would otherwise. Western politicians have sold us out, so it's up to the rest of us to defend our way of life by understanding Islam and telling the truth about it in whatever way we can. If we can't even call Islam by its name, how the hell are we going to defend ourselves against its true believers? One could argue that we'd be better off if the West would just choose one of the many terms currently used for the enemy's ideology. For my part, I call the enemy what they are, "Jihadists", and our response, "The War on Jihad." But behind it all, it's Islam that makes the enemy tick.


Despite my frustrations with the refusal of many to call Islam "Islam", I know that those who speak out against Jihad put themselves in danger, and I respect their courage. But it's important that we acknowledge Islam's place in the threat we face and say so without equivocation. Not saying "Islam" helps Islam and hurts us. So let's begin calling the enemy's ideology by its name. Let's start calling Islam "Islam."



Postscript: Below is my response to those critics, especially  Muslims and Leftists, who make the issue about Muslims and not Islam; who always allege that critics of Islam are condemning 1.5 billion people, that Muslims are good people and innocent, etc., etc. From my piece Non-Muslim Muslims and the Jihad Against the West:
For those who want to make this about Muslims and not Islam, here are some of my thoughts on that:
First, my name is Bosch and I’m a recovered Muslim, so I have some insight into this, coupled with the fact that I studied Islam as if my life depended on it after 9/11.
There is Islam and there are Muslims. Muslims who take Islam seriously are at war with us and Muslims who don’t aren’t. But that doesn’t mean we should consider these reluctant Muslims allies against Jihad. I’ve been around Muslims my entire life and most of them truly don’t care about Islam. The problem I have with many of these essentially non-Muslim Muslims, especially in the middle of this war being waged on us by their more consistent co-religionists, is that they give the enemy cover. They force us to play a game of Muslim Roulette since we can’t tell which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does. And their indifference about the evil being committed in the name of their religion is a big reason why their reputation is where it is.
So while I understand that most Muslims are not at war with us, they’ve proven in their silence and inaction against jihad that they’re not on our side either, and there’s nothing we can say or do to change that. We just have to finally accept it and stop expecting them to come around, while doing our best to kill those who are trying to kill us.
Another problem with Muslims who aren’t very Muslim is that they lead some among us to conclude that they must be practicing a more enlightened form of Islam. They’re not. They’re “practicing” life in non-Muslim countries, where they are free to live as they choose. But their “Islam” is not the Islam. There’s no separate ideology apart from Islam that’s being practiced by these Muslims in name only, there’s no such thing as “Western Islam”.
Non-observant Muslims are not our problem, but neither are they the solution to our problem. Our problem is Islam and its most consistent practitioners. There is nothing in Islam that stays the hand of Muslims who want to kill non-Muslims. If an individual Muslim is personally peaceful, it’s not because of Islam, it’s because of his individual choice, which is why I often say that your average Muslim is morally superior to Mohammad, to their own religion. The very rare Muslim who helps us against Jihad is acting against his religion, but that doesn’t stop some among us from thinking that his choice somehow shines a good light on Islam. It doesn’t. A good Muslim according to us is a bad Muslim according to Islam.
Read more here.

Thursday, January 07, 2010

up is dOwn

TOUGH CRITIC




Killian & Muslim 'critic' in an outtake from The Infidel.

To new blog visitors, Killian Duke is the hero of my upcoming graphic novel, The Infidel. His Muslim background comes to the forefront of his life on 9-11, and he responds by creating the ruthless counter-jihad superhero Pigman. And the daggers of his Muslim critics are as metaphorical as this Koran passage:

"When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them...." Ch. 47:4

For Mohammad's violent history kills the pc myth that the violent passages in the Koran are metaphorical.

Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Sunday, January 03, 2010

Friday, January 01, 2010

THE INFIDEL 2010

























THE INFIDEL graphic novel will begin in 2010:


A story about twin brothers, Killian Duke and Salaam Duka, whose Muslim background comes to the forefront of their lives on 9/11. Killian responds to the attacks by creating a counter-jihad superhero comic book called Pigman, as Salaam surrenders to Islam and becomes a Born Again Muslim, following the faith to wherever it leads him. The Pigman story is the comic book within the graphic novel that's a super echo of the main story.


Here's a look at the main characters from The Infidel



In the meantime, I currently have available a collection of my blog work promoting The Infidel, which includes a number of essays on the threat we face, called ProPiganda: Drawing the Line Against Jihad, which mainly features Pigman giving the enemy what they deserve, in word and deed.

So thanks for visiting, take a look around and leave your thoughts.