Thursday, May 29, 2014

Again? NEVER

Here was my first idea at making a visual for the website JewsCanShoot.com. They opted to go with a different visual. My friend Doris Wise Montrose, president of Children of Jewish Holocaust Survivors - the first person to invite me to speak about my work- is behind the website. Here's the story behind her new venture...


The Meaning Behind Pigman's Chest Symbol

An Extra from THE INFIDEL #2


Sunday, May 25, 2014

Obama Takes Off His Mask...

Picture, hat tip, Larry Elder. And here are all of my Al Sharpton-related cartoons and blog posts. 

Calling Islam Islam: It's "Name The Enemy", Not *Rename* The Enemy

Moderate truth-teller Daniel Pipes (Dream) has further moderated his stance on Islam by actually entertaining the idea of "Moderate Islamism", with Andrew C. McCarthy- who I've debated about this- giving it some credence. We've gone from naming enemy ideology -Nazism, Communism- to Renaming it - "Islamic Totalitarianism", "Radical Islam", "Islamism", etc,. all to the enemy's benefit, since these misnomers, or as I call them, Islamisnomers, imply that Islam as such is fine. If you're afraid to name the problem- Islam- then you can't fight it effectively, and the enemy wants this to continue forever. I'm once again posting my argument for why we should Always Call Islam Islam:

I wrote the following piece - Calling Islam "Islam" - a few years ago, and I think it’s worth posting again. I notice that after each Islamic attack against us, people begin to use more proper terminology to identify the enemy, which is crucial in eventually defeating the enemy. I recall watching panel discussions after 9/11, with each panelist using a different term to describe the enemy we face. That annoyed the hell out of me as I think it’s incredibly important to identify the proper terms when speaking about our enemy, and to NEVER create terms, for whatever reason. To me, the only difference between “Islamism” and Islam is three letters. Below I try my best to make the case why we should always call Islam “Islam.”

Western intellectuals and commentators refer to the enemy’s ideology as:
“Islamic Fundamentalism,” “Islamic Extremism,” “Totalitarian Islam,” “Islamofascism,” “Political Islam,” “Militant Islam,” “Bin Ladenism,” “Islamonazism,” “Radical Islam,” “Islamism,” etc….

The enemy calls it “Islam.”

Imagine, if during past wars, we used terms such as “Radical Nazism,” “Extremist Shinto” and “Militant Communism.” The implication would be that there are good versions of those ideologies, which would then lead some to seek out “moderate” Nazis. Those who use terms other than “Islam” create the impression that it’s some variant of Islam that’s behind the enemy that we’re facing. A term such as “Militant Islam” is redundant, but our politicians continue praising Islam as if it were their own religion. Bush told us “Islam is peace” — after 2,996 Americans were murdered in its name. He maintained that illusion throughout his two terms, and never allowed our soldiers to defeat the enemy. And now we have Obama, who tells us, from Egypt:
“I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”
If only he felt that way about America. Washington’s defense of Islam has trumped the defense of America and this dereliction of duty could well be called Islamgate.

Islam is a political religion; the idea of a separation of Mosque and State is unheard of in the Muslim world. Islam has a doctrine of warfare, Jihad, which is fought in order to establish Islamic (“Sharia”) Law, which is, by nature, totalitarian. Sharia Law calls for, among other things: the dehumanization of women; the flogging/stoning/killing of adulterers; and the killing of homosexuals, apostates and critics of Islam. All of this is part of orthodox Islam, not some “extremist” form of it. If jihadists were actually “perverting a great religion,” Muslims would have been able to discredit them on Islamic grounds and they would have done so by now. The reason they can’t is because jihadists are acting according to the words of Allah, the Muslim God. From the Koran:

“Slay the idolators wherever you find them…” Chapter 9, verse 5

“When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them….” Ch. 47:4

Beyond the doctrine, there is the historical figure of Mohammad, who, more than anyone, defines Islam. How would you judge a man who lies, cheats, steals, rapes and murders as a way of life? This evil man is Islam’s ideal man, Mohammad. Whatever he said and did is deemed moral by virtue of the fact that he said it and did it. It’s no accident that the only morality that could sanction his behavior was his own. Nor is it an accident that Muslims who model themselves after him are the most violent.

For the 13 years that Mohammad failed to spread Islam by non-violent means, he was not so much peaceful as he was powerless. It was only through criminal activity and with the help of a large gang of followers that he managed to gain power. But he wanted his moral pretense too, so he changed Islam to reflect the fact that the only way it could survive was through force. And so, acting on Allah’s conveniently timed “revelation” that Islam can and should be spread by the sword, Mohammad led an army of Muslims across Arabia in the first jihad. From then on, violence became Islam’s way in the world. And today, acting on Mohammad’s words, “War is deceit” — in the sense that Muslims use earlier “peaceful” verses from the Koran as a weapon against the ignorance and good will of their victims. Those “peaceful” passages in the Koran were abrogated by later passages calling for eternal war against those who do not submit to Islam. How Mohammad spread Islam influenced the content of its doctrine and therefore tells us exactly what Islam means.
Note also that the only reason we’re talking about Islam is because we’ve been forced to by its jihad. And where are Islam’s “conscientious objectors”? Nowhere to be found, for even lax Muslims have been silent against jihad. But that doesn’t stop desperate Westerners from pointing to them as representives of “Moderate Islam.”

Far from being a personal faith, Islam is a collectivist ideology that rejects a live-and-let-live attitude towards non-Muslims. And while the jihadists may not represent all Muslims, they do represent Islam. In the end, most Muslims have proven themselves to be mere sheep to their jihadist wolves, irrelevant as allies in this war. Recovering Muslims call the enemy’s ideology “Islam,” and they dismiss the idea of “Moderate Islam” as they would the idea of “Moderate Evil.” When, based on his actions, Mohammad would be described today as a “Muslim Extremist,” then non-violent Muslims should condemn their prophet and their religion, not those who point it out.

Islam is the enemy’s ideology and evading that fact only helps its agents get away with more murder than they would otherwise. Western politicians have sold us out, so it’s up to the rest of us to defend our way of life by understanding Islam and telling the truth about it in whatever way we can. If we can’t even call Islam by its name, how the hell are we going to defend ourselves against its true believers? One could argue that we’d be better off if the West would just choose one of the many terms currently used for the enemy’s ideology. For my part, I call the enemy what they are, “Jihadists,” and our response, “The War on Jihad.” But behind it all, it’s Islam that makes the enemy tick.
Despite my frustrations with the refusal of many to call Islam “Islam,” I know that those who speak out against Jihad put themselves in danger, and I respect their courage. But it’s important that we acknowledge Islam’s place in the threat we face and say so without equivocation. Not saying “Islam” helps Islam and hurts us. So let’s begin calling the enemy’s ideology by its name. Let’s start calling Islam “Islam.”

Below is my response to those critics, especially Muslims and Leftists, who make the issue about Muslims and not Islam; who always allege that critics of Islam are condemning 1.5 billion people, that Muslims are good people and innocent, etc., etc. So here's an excerpt from my piece Non-Muslim Muslims and the Jihad Against the West (aka My Name is Bosch and I'm a Recovered Muslim):

For those who want to make this about Muslims and not Islam, here are some of my thoughts on that:

First, my name is Bosch and I’m a recovered Muslim, so I have some insight into this, coupled with the fact that I studied Islam as if my life depended on it after 9/11.

There is Islam and there are Muslims. Muslims who take Islam seriously are at war with us and Muslims who don’t aren’t. But that doesn’t mean we should consider these reluctant Muslims allies against Jihad. I’ve been around Muslims my entire life and most of them truly don’t care about Islam. The problem I have with many of these essentially non-Muslim Muslims, especially in the middle of this war being waged on us by their more consistent co-religionists, is that they give the enemy cover. They force us to play a game of Muslim Roulette since we can’t tell which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does. And their indifference about the evil being committed in the name of their religion is a big reason why their reputation is where it is.

So while I understand that most Muslims are not at war with us, they’ve proven in their silence and inaction against jihad that they’re not on our side either, and there’s nothing we can say or do to change that. We just have to finally accept it and stop expecting them to come around, while doing our best to kill those who are trying to kill us.

Another problem with Muslims who aren’t very Muslim is that they lead some among us to conclude that they must be practicing a more enlightened form of Islam. They’re not. They’re “practicing” life in non-Muslim countries, where they are free to live as they choose. But their “Islam” is not the Islam. There’s no separate ideology apart from Islam that’s being practiced by these Muslims in name only, there’s no such thing as “Western Islam”.

Non-observant Muslims are not our problem, but neither are they the solution to our problem. Our problem is Islam and its most consistent practitioners. There is nothing in Islam that stays the hand of Muslims who want to kill non-Muslims. If an individual Muslim is personally peaceful, it’s not because of Islam, it’s because of his individual choice, which is why I often say that your average Muslim is morally superior to Mohammad, to their own religion. The very rare Muslim who helps us against Jihad is acting against his religion, but that doesn’t stop some among us from thinking that his choice somehow shines a good light on Islam. It doesn’t. A good Muslim according to us is a bad Muslim according to Islam.

Read whole thing here

"Thank You For Not Calling Islam Islam." - The Enemy

In light of some Western Islam analysts Still playing the Islam name game during wartime (Daniel Pipes actually used the term "Moderate Islamism" recently) here's my argument for why we should Always call Islam Islam. 

Thursday, May 22, 2014

"Extremist" Koran vs "Moderate" Koran?


A few of my other tweets along these lines:

That non-violent Muslim you know? His Koran tells him "Kill the infidels wherever u find them". That he ignores it speaks of Him, Not Islam

    • Every single Muslim's Koran tells them to "kill the infidels wherever you find them", yet those who act accordingly are said to be deviants.

      Muslims who take Islam seriously are the problem, yet we're told that we're supposed to focus on Muslims who Don't take Islam seriously.

      • Muslims who take Islam seriously are the problem, yet we're supposed to believe that Muslims who don't take Islam seriously r the solution?

        The "Moderate" Muslim's Koran is moderate, the "Extremist" Muslim's Koran is "extremist" ... & Islam means peace

"NAZI" Is Not An Argument, Marvel

In response to my calling them out for their Islamophilia, Marvels' Tom Brevoort cries "NAZI".
After he pulled that a number of times, I tweeted:
Here are all of my posts against the SuperCowards in comic books who've sold us out to Islam.


Wednesday, May 21, 2014

The Obama Republicans

I first used the term The Obama Republicans in a blog post from July 2013 that I'm reposting below, after Breitbart.com has come around to it. It's a telling, damning term and it deserves wide dissemination. As I wrote then...

I can imagine Obama thinking: 'With opposition like this, who needs democrats?'









From The Party of Lincoln to The Party of Obama. From The Reagan Democrats, to The Obama Republicans. The republican party has proven themselves to be as statist as the democrat party, and Obama has helped expose them as such with their refusal to oppose him in any serious way since he's been president. I used to call them Slowcialists, but since they lost the 2012 presidential election, they've raised taxes, they've passed Omnibus democrat bills, they've not investigated Obama's scandals in any "comprehensive" way. Boehner hasn't appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the Benghazi massacre, which would better help us get to the bottom of what the hell Obama was doing for 8 hours during the attacks. We all have our strong suspicions about what he did that night, but we need to know Exactly what it was. 

The GOP has symbolically voted to repeal Obamacare, while knowing full well that it's an impotent move on their part since Harry Reid will kill it in the senate, but they still feel a need to try and pretend to us that they oppose it. I can go on, but even as I write, the republicans are probably doing something to hurt the country, while helping Obama. Here are a few of my tweets from the last couple of days on this:

Shutting down the Gov is the Worst thing that could Ever happen. Worse than Obamacare, Obama's scandals, Obama, etc.... & Islam means peace (as the GOP is strangely terrified of shutting the government down for no doubt some gutless reason)

GOP: you're supposed 2 *Defund* Obamacare, *Not* Defend it. DEFUND it. U actually think u were voted in2 power in '10 for another reason?!

Those who feel we shouldn't try to defund Obamacare because it'll be too "messy": WTF do think Obamacare will BE but sick, twisted & messy?

Defunding Obamacare will b "messy" Karl Rove? Time 2 get MESSY America. There r 2 Kinds of Americans 2day: Those 4 Obamacare & Those Against

̶r̶e̶p̶u̶b̶l̶i̶c̶a̶n̶s̶ ̶d̶e̶m̶o̶c̶r̶a̶t̶s̶- statists

Statist in chief has helped expose republicans 2 b as statist as democRats. While we can't wait 2 b rid of him, they can't help but envy him

The difference between the republican party & the democrat party is that republicans still feel a need 2 semi-pretend they don't like BigGov

Washington DC will drop Everything to work on Comprehensive Government Reform ... & Islam means peace

And my latest piece at Front Page Magazine touches on this as well.


Sunday, May 18, 2014

Separation of Santorum and State

I've been calling for the Separation of State and Santorum for awhile now and he doesn't seem to be going away anytime soon. Now, he's saying such things as "conservatism is not about no government" and “it’s OK to have strong opinions, so long as you don’t go too far with them.” Check out what Dr. Michael Hurd has to say about these two quotes and more here.



Marvel Promotes Hitler’s Favorite Religion; Marvel Exec Calls Me "Nazi"

And that religion is, of course, Islam. Also, Hitler is Islam's Favorite Infidel.

As you may know, I've had a running twitter fight with Tom Brevoort, Marvel's Senior Vice President of Publishing, over their promotion of Islam. Here's my latest:

Here was his response after a twitter follower of mine, @MeredithMarsha1, joined in with the criticism, writing, "Why do you suppose our 'good' muslims won't speak out against terrorist? Worried about fatwa & getting murdered?"

And here are All of my cartoons and blog posts about mainstream comics' submission to Islam.


Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Political Correctness in Short


Islam has Nothing to do with ̶t̶e̶r̶r̶o̶r̶i̶s̶m̶- peace


Marvel Comics Is In The Shadow of Islam

Whatever Marvel Comics believes they're doing with their "Muslim superhero", they're promoting Osama bin Laden's religion. They're promoting a religion that sanctions misogyny, censorship, Jew-hatred, homophobia, wife-beatings, beheadings, honor killings, pedophilia/“child marriages”, murdering infidels, etc.

They're promoting Evil.

If Marvel truly believes -as no doubt their Muslim editor and Muslim writer has told them- that "Islam had nothing to do with 9/11", then why don't they have their "Muslim superhero" make the Islamic argument against Muslims who are at war with us and then have her go after those who've "perverted" her "peaceful" religion? Because there is no Islamic argument against Muslims who are at war with us. Marvel has to pay a price for promoting enemy propaganda during a time of war, but I don't know of any other cartoonist who's taken them to task in the way I have. I need some back up. 




Today's Islam Tweets

I think my tweets from today are worth reposting here.




The Islamic Argument Against Al Qaeda...

… Doesn't Exist.


Monday, May 05, 2014

The Beautiful Truth


...breather...

Star Wars Day

May The Fourth Be With You.

Below is a painting I did of Anakin Skywalker fighting overwhelming evil with both a Jedi & Sith light-saber and a pencil drawing of a Punisher type Darth Vader. For more on my thoughts on Star Wars and my thinking behind the Anakin painting, here's my piece from 2012, Star Wars Reborn?




Saturday, May 03, 2014

Commiedians

Why don't Commiedians go after Obama?… Oh, right… I mean left.


Friday, May 02, 2014

"Dude, Benghazi Was, Like, Two Years Ago"

UPDATE: I discussed this story with Amy Peikoff on her show, Don't Let It Go…Unheard earlier today here in an episode called Dude! A Pro-American Administration Is, Like, So Three Decades Ago!



And here's what Jay Carney said about Benghazi only six months after the attack.

#BarackBenghaziObama